|

|
Despite
the firm accolades for this first volume of Kathryn Gray from the likes of
Douglas Dunn and Maurice Riordan, it left me with mixed feelings. Here is a
highly-trained talent; among her ÔacknowledgmentsÕ is that to Michael Donaghy
and his star pupil John Stammers. A poem like ÔThose Things I CarryÕ, and
indeed several others, show the too-much influence of Donaghy: the clipped,
even tight-lipped torturing of words in a line, into a line,
HereÕs a word for us -
strictly untranslatable -
having nothing of the kick of legs and stone as Babel
falls (and because of which youÕd never hear in chapel)
from the softer tongue of a woman
who birthed to the world working men,
well-travelled down to black, carrying her pain ...
(ÔThe
CwtchÕ)
While a poem like ÔThe ContinentsÕ gets so oblique in its working as to
become fairly opaque. On the other hand, the poem ÔYou Hated Your FlatÕ
justifies DunnÕs plaudit of Ôdelightfully accessibleÕ and RiordanÕs comment
about the whole collection as Ôa thoroughly twenty-first century debutÕ.
There is a sense throughout the book of a young poet finding her feet in
words - experimenting
but not innovating -
showing influences and not always having too much of importance to say. But
promise definitely meets with performance in the poem ÔRecessÕ about life in
the Civil Service:
The way light will fill and form this very office
that you see just now close in on you, as it is, left
to WhitehallÕs forgotten months, the ministerÕs desk
brings back the sadness of the civil servant:
England happening somewhere down an avenue,
summers no more than a fountain pen, a billet doux
quite
unbegun on the bed of a floral room,
hot as shame behind the sulks of a teenage girl.
Yes, of course, ÔEngland happily somewhere down an avenueÕ is pure Larkin but
the poem is none the worse for that. It shows - as
do others - an ability to
suggest character with the briefest of brushstrokes and, via such depiction,
to bring out the insights and moods of a way of life. Again, another
interesting poem is ÔThe Pocket Anglo-Welsh CanonÕ which shows the poetÕs wit
at its best, veiledly critical, finding the just phrases for bitterness - a bit like R.S. Thomas. If Gray can strike a
proper balance between ellipsis and encripsis her work should develop most
interestingly.
The Mirror Trade - Zo‘
SkouldingÕs newest collection - is
curiously objective: formal in tone without being too formal in measure. To
use that critical clichŽ, it is a volume that repays reading: each time more
of its quiet thoughtfulness revealing itself. The poem ÔFeathersÕ illustrates
the point. I should, of course, have picked up the clue from the tone of its
first phrase / line, ÔNo-one ever knew. A wreck, we thought...Õ AudenÕs
ÔMusŽe des Beaux ArtsÕ. Let me quote enough of it to help make the point:
No-one
ever knew. A wreck, we thought,
a
long way out at sea. We never found
another
body ...
A
foreigner, we were sure of it:
his
mouth didnÕt look the right shape
to
have spoken our language.
When
we turned him over we found
scorch
marks on his back as if
he
had escaped a burning ship;
what
clothes he wore were soaked in wax ...
...
We guessed at candles -
frantically
signalling at night ...
we
thought of a host of angels ...(etc.)
Though it says it nowhere, the poem is not about a drowned sailor or an
angel, but about Icarus who lost his wings Ôbeating towards the sunÕ.
Sometimes - in a poem like
ÔFeetÕ for example -
there is a sense of a conscious writing about a topic (like in a school
essay): which is why there is a feeling that some of the poems are really
exercises in informational strategy, if the phrase may be forgiven, rather
than deeply felt eructations of the intellect and heart. Occasionally,
however, such rise above themselves -
despite their motive - and
one example is the deeply ironical ÔOptimistic PoemÕ: a possible anthology
piece. While the sequence ÔSleep InsideÕ, mainly based upon the letters and
diaries of SkouldingÕs grandfather, enables us to participate in backward
glancing at a vanished imperial world. Carol Rumens, whose opinion of poetry
is always worth hearing, saw more in these poems still, speaking of a Ôtruly
contemporary sensibilityÕ and ÔUnfolding surprises but never withholding
meaning.Õ
Christine Evans, whose volume of Selected Poems draws on four previous
collections, is a mature poet with a beautiful womanly vigour in her writing
(ÒIs it energy or faith / that breeds content in me?Ó). She writes both short
and long poems; and in her long poems does not dilute the poetic intensity,
Nothing
so delicate as pleasure
showed,
although it surely flowered
in
the leafy summer evenings of her youth
or
berrying with her babies by the river
when
time flowed like a shining tune
within
the blackbirdÕs song ...
That is from her 1986 long poem about a shepherdÕs widow coming to terms with
her husbandÕs death. Then, from inhabiting the persona of
a shepherdÕs widow, we next have Evans Ôloosening, her Ôvoice / into the
echoing vault of the oceanÕ to become a ÔWhale DreamÕ in which, singing, ÔI
heard the closure of my notes grow tender / for the long pre-human
clearness.Õ So that, in all kinds of ways, we see this mature talent is
protean as well.
Interestingly, the long poem-sequence, ÔCometary PhasesÕ, where a Ôwinter of
star-watching charts a sonÕs growthÕ, I found less interesting than ÔFalling
BackÕ about the shepherdÕs widow. Persona not personal
makes much better art most times, and that is something contemporary poets
should constantly ponder. Such a technique or approach involves a capacity
for empathy, or entering-into-other, that Christine Evans seems to do
effortlessly - if,
occasionally, ridiculously when she writes in the short poem ÔLlynÕ, ÔWhen
morning comes at last / houses sit up with pricked ears / on reefs of
land...Õ Now and then, also, there is a hint of spiritual preoccupation as in
the poems,
What
brinks, what late summer vistas
We
are all ripening towards
As
we wait to see, wait
For
the sun
To
burn a way through.
And another long sequence, ÔIsland of Dark HorsesÕ, each section of which is
subtitled by the hermitsÕ/monksÕ offices of prayers; but her knowledge of
divinity is more historical than experiential. Hers is an open-minded secular
nature poetry that when it ponders ÔtheyÕ, who believed, writes,
...
they
- out of what
they know is kindness -
embrace me and commiserate
for my lack of faith or fun
and I - out of what I
am not sure -
am silent, knowing only
time goes on
scraping the dust
from the stone, and from our faces.
Even empathy, then, is not enough to gain understanding? Still, she is an
interesting poet. As all three poets reviewed here are, in their different
ways.
©
William Oxley 2004
|