|
|
More of the Same
The Man Who Tried To Hug
Clouds, Jim Bennett
As Yesterday Begins, Les Merton
Dropping Ecstasy With The
Angels, Dee Rimbaud
[each £7.99, bluechrome, PO Box 109, Portishead, Bristol
BS20 7ZJ]
|
|

|
These three books all stem from bluechrome and
when they arrived for review they were flipped through quickly as is my
custom-and-practice. Immediately I became so irritated with the general
presentation that they had to be laid aside in the knowledge that my review
of the content would have been adversely affected by my initial reaction to
the general layout; the random use of peculiar fonts with no apparent design
or purpose and the scattered alleged 'artwork' or sketches which to a greater
or lesser extent afflict them all, serves no purpose that I can fathom.
Do not misunderstand me; variations in fonts can be useful; to set text in
separate blocks within poems for example and to differentiate 'voices'. But
all of these books use totally obscure fonts for the titles of poems which,
as I said, simply aggravate and distract.
Each has a ÔcontentsÕ page but this merely refers the reader to different
ÔsectionsÕ which in turn have their own ÔcontentsÕ listing but there is no
comprehensive titlesÕ index in any which again, is a little annoying. Had I
been browsing in a bookshop I do not think I would have purchased any of
them. Take note bluechrome or, if this was by the design of the poets, take
note Messrs. Bennett, Merton and Rimbaud.
To make another general point; most of the great poets wrote poems which were
ÔturkeysÕ, most of them never seen light of day but some did; I recall
TennysonÕs ÔQueen of the MayÕ and often imagine his 6 feet bearded figure
reading it in the local pub:
You must wake and call me early,
call me
early, mother dear;
For I'm to be
Queen o' the May, mother,
I'm to be
Queen o' the May.
Or WordsworthÕs equally delightful gobbler in ÔThe ThornÕ describing ÔThe
heap thatÕs like an infantÕs graveÕ:
And to the
left, three yards beyond,
You see a little
muddy pond
Of water,
never dry;
IÕve measured
it from side to side:
ÔTis three
feet long, and two feet wide.
That is how the poem appeared in Lyrical Ballads and OK he altered the last two lines later but still; it is not
something Wordsworth would be proud to be remembered by.
I wonder how many of the poems in these three anthologies, in later years,
the poets would wish they had never published? So much is mundane, contrived,
ill balanced in rhythm or layout, overblown with hyperbole, clichŽd or simply
in need of further editing. I give you a sample from each without further
comment.
ÔCountingÕ by
Jim Bennett:
I used to
have trouble counting
I used my
fingers and toes
but then I
discovered binary
so now I only
use my nose
ÔMister
StutterÕ by Les Merton:
Mister Stut
Stutter
Finds it very
hard to to write
Ha ha ha
haiku
From
ÔGraphomaniaÕ by Dee Rimbaud:
I have sifted
through
The fine
sands
Of your
refined mind
But nothing have I found.
|
|

|
Jim BennettÕs The Man Who Tried To Hug Clouds is an enjoyable read. Bennett is a native of my own adopted City
of Liverpool and I have heard him perform his poetry
frequently, he is a talented entertainer if somewhat parochial, and the
latter despite the fact that he has clearly lived an interesting life. There
are some minor gems in this collection, some whole poems that tug at the
heart and linger in the memory like Ôat night when the world endsÕ which is
beautifully constructed, delightfully open and honest and yet simple both in
form and content. And others, which I have heard him perform and which, even
when I am reading them aloud to myself, conjure an unstoppable smile. Poems
such as Ôthe car parked in your driveÕ with its witty, pungent punch-line.
(But after being reprinted so many times I wonder why a line therein still
reads; Ôthe driver was elsewhere/ and so where youÕÉ? And the same error occurs in the poems ÔmuseÕ and
ÔheroesÕ) I hope this is a bluechrome misprint or Bennett might have his
lecturerÕs salary recalculated. This is my favourite book of the three and,
once I had gotten past the weird fonts in the titles and had forgiven him for
his poem dedicated to the truly appalling Lawrence Upton I might even have bought
it. However every single poem herein has been published elsewhere previously,
hence, what we are asked to pay £7.99 for is more of the same... on second
thoughts, before I forked out my cash, I think I would check how many of
these poems I already have.
Les MertonÕs As Yesterday Begins is more of a mixed bag. I have selected MertonÕs work to appear in an anthology I edited
recently and am aware that he is, like Bennett, widely appreciated as a
performance poet. The contents of this anthology vary enormously and perhaps
the poet is at his best when writing simply in a style which reminds me of
HemingwayÕs tightly constructed prose. ÔFort St Elmo, Malta Ð 1966Õ is just
such a poem, it is a fascinating account of his meeting with Ôa navy manÕ in
which many emotions are examined but so too is the futility of war in a way
that is subtly understated. And the section; ÔThe Hitler LettersÕ containing
just two poems is again profound and though-provoking. It is mostly new
poetry in this book but still some repetition and the font mixtures and
sketches herein are the worst mix of the three. The poet also seems obsessed
with haiku and, as in the example above, never quite seems to get it right, I
think they number round about two dozen and while some work, most do not. It
gets so when you turn a page and see another three line form you mutter;
ÔAhhh, more of the same.Õ But in other areas Merton displays a grasp of the
craft of constructing poetry that is uplifting and I probably would buy this
anthology; if only for ÔMuddy Water and all that jazzÕ which is a simple
snapshot of an event and ÔWordsÕ, a finely constructed poem which deflates
ego in its examination of what we are all trying to do as poets; word
juggling.
|
|

|
Dee RimbaudÕs Dropping Ecstasy With The Angels is my cup of tea. I love RimbaudÕs workÉ in
small doses and when he steers clear of hyperbole. Indeed, four of the poems
in this book appear in another anthology I selected and edited just a few
months ago. A sample of RimbaudÕs tendency to not use a word when a dozen
will suffice occurs early in the anthology. ÔWhen Angels Collide And Bang
Their HeadsÕ is a longish poem which probably would benefit from a severe
pruning (as indeed would the title). The second stanza reads thus:
Dull as
valium, each grain courses
Its bruised
passage into filaments
Of dead skin,
Through
eczema miasma,
Into the raw
centre
Of sense,
sensitivity, sensibility:
Crushing the
embers
Of burned out
dreams
With an
eviscerated fatal finality.
Perhaps before heÕd reached Ôeviscerated fatal finality.Õ the Captain of
Douglas AdamsÕ Vogan Construction Ship would have hurled Rimbaud into empty
space. However the overall feeling I got from reading the book in its
totality was a deep sense of satisfaction, for when he chooses to Rimbaud can
encapsulate a phrase here or a stanza there that says it almost perfectly as
in ÔStarbrightÕ where he dares to rewrite a Keatsian notion and does it
surprisingly well; ÔWe need nothing / And we need know nothing, / But the
precious and imprecise beauty of being.Õ Or this phrase from the poem
ÔintoxicatedÕ with its warmly humerous observation; ÔThe gods are sleeping in
heavenly beds, / Dreaming that all is well with the world.Õ
Where Rimbaud triumphs is in his vision. His is the most expansive book of
these three poets, the one which strives most to present something new in
form, content and above all in ideas. This is the one which will inspire you
if you are a poet and uplift you if you are merely a student or a reader Éand
I was just about to add that I would definitely purchase this anthology when
I suddenly realised that it takes a page and a half to list all the other
places where these poems have appeared previously!
Oh no! Once again itÕs more of the same!
© Alan Corkish 2004
|